Non-filing of annual returns led to maximum penalties on the company and directors. The key takeaway is that Section 92 ...
Directors were penalised for failing to provide mandatory disclosures in EOGM notices. The key takeaway is that full ...
Failure to report resignation and appointment of directors led to penalties under company law. The key takeaway is that Board ...
The adjudicating authority held that delay in filing return of allotment attracts penalty under Section 42, but relief under ...
Unsigned financial statements uploaded with statutory filings were held non-compliant. Liability was fixed on the certifying ...
The authority ruled that absence of a loan does not waive compliance obligations. Failure to intimate satisfaction of charge ...
The order holds that utilisation of private placement money before allotment and filing of returns violates Section 42, ...
Regulatory authorities held that claiming compliance with accounting standards without actual adherence or explanation ...
The ROC penalised a company for commencing operations without a valid declaration of commencement. The key takeaway is that ...
The ROC held that depositing interim dividend in a current account instead of a separate account violates section 123(4).
The ROC held that failure to appoint a woman director within the prescribed period violates section 149(1). Monetary ...
ITAT Chennai remanded a case involving Rs. 11.26 lakh cash gifts back to the CIT(A), allowing the NRI assessee another opportunity to substantiate the claim with supporting ...
Results that may be inaccessible to you are currently showing.
Hide inaccessible results