ITAT Pune held that approval of Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax [PCCIT] required for order passed under section ...
Your academic background is an important part of your application. Commonly required documents are: Proof of Admission; This ...
The regulations define key terms, including “enterprise in default” and “person in default,” referring to entities or ...
According to data from the New York Mercantile Exchange Comex, global silver prices have reached their highest level in five ...
Institute of Company Secretaries of India (ICSI) has announced the results of the Company Secretaries (CS) Examinations for ...
ITAT Chandigarh held that treating capital gains earned on sale of shares as bogus merely on the basis of warning letter of SEBI without any incriminating material found during course of search ...
No Reassessment After 4 Years for AO’s Error in Computing Income When Material Facts Fully Disclosed
Baldota, quashing an income tax reassessment notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The case pertained to the assessment year 2015-16, with the reassessment notice issued on ...
The Hon’ble Courts, as recent judgments show, are highly reluctant to such a period of limitation, particularly where there is no express or implied exclusion of the applicability of the Limitation ...
Mumbai had earlier admitted a Section 9 application under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) filed by Alcuris Healthcare, treating the outstanding dues as operational debt. However, the NCLAT ...
Then, what is the need /relevance of the prescription in terms of R 24A of the SEBI LODR to the effect that unless a majority of the partners of a Firm of PCS hold PRC, a Firm is not eligible for ...
Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Shandilya Properties LLP, challenging an assessment order issued under Section 143 (3) read with Section 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The ...
Delhi recently ruled in favor of Svam Toyal Packaging Industries Pvt. Ltd., overturning a demand of ₹21,43,27,904 in customs duty, along with interest and a penalty of ₹50,00,000. The dispute centered ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback