Several of you responded to my “Sunday thought” by saying that the first step out of the mess we’re in is to get rid of the Supreme Court’s bonkers Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission ...
The 2010 Supreme Court ruling of Citizens United v. the Federal Election Commission gave corporations the First Amendment right of freedom of speech by permitting unrestricted political campaign ...
The No Labels Party is changing its name to the Arizona Independent Party. But the Arizona Citizens Clean Election Commission ...
Pete Skandalakis, who took over the case after Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis was disqualified, said the case ...
Several of you responded to my “Sunday thought” by saying that the first step out of the mess we’re in is to get rid of the ...
Voters in Maine in 2024 approved a new $5,000 limit on contributions to super PACs within their state. The constitutionality of that law is now being litigated in federal court, giving campaign ...
Tribune Content Agency on MSNOpinion
Robert B. Reich: How to get rid of ‘Citizens United’
Several of you responded to my “Sunday thought” by saying that the first step out of the mess we’re in is to get rid of the ...
AlterNet on MSNOpinion
How the deep-red state of Montana could save democracy | Opinion
Several of you responded to my “Sunday thought” yesterday by saying that the first step out of the mess we’re in is to get ...
The current concentration of wealth is unlike anything in history. So is billionaires’ involvement in politics.
Polls suggest 74 percent of voters in the state will back a ballot initiative to counter the effects of Citizens United.
The vast majority of Americans — no matter their partisan identification — say unlimited political spending weakens democracy and wealthy donors have too much power in elections, a new national poll ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results