In this case, the petitioner challenged the order dated 5 January 2026 and the consequential rectification order passed under Section 74A(5) of the CGST Act, 2017. The petitioner contended that, after ...
In this case, the assessee was transporting an excavator from the project site of M/s OPSIS Projects India Pvt. Ltd., Trans Ganga City, Unnao, back to its registered premises at Kanpur. The movement ...
The Rajasthan High Court's judgment in M/s Shree Karni Electrovision v. Union of India & Ors. (2026 Taxo.online 2587) ...
GST Appeals in Limbo: Madras High Court Rules Time Spent on Rectification Petitions Must Be Excluded
Landmark Verdict Reshapes Limitation Periods for Filing GST Appeals Under Section 107 CASE: E2E Supply Chain Solutions ...
In this case, the appellant was subjected to scrutiny of its returns for FY 2020-21. The department noticed excess availment ...
The Petitioner, M/s Metal Trade Incorporation, a trader in Iron and Steel Products duly registered under GST and regularly ...
The Supreme Court's judgment in GR Infra Projects Limited Ratlam v. State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors. (2026 Taxo.online 2535) ...
Council is scheduled to be held in New Delhi on September 12, while an officers’ meeting is scheduled for September 11, ...
In this case, the assessee transported goods from Nayaganj, Kanpur, to Fatehpur in vehicle No. UP-71-B-9301 under tax ...
Landmark Ruling in Tata Steel Quashes SCNs Issued Beyond Time CASE: M/s Tata Steel Limited vs. Union of India (Supreme Court) CITATION: 2026 Taxo.online 2588 1. BACKGROUND The Supreme Court’s judgment ...
In this case, M/s Tata Steel Limited was subjected to proceedings concerning three financial years, namely FY 2018-19, 2019-20 and 2020-21, pursuant to audit objections raised by the office of the ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results